Corporate Social Responsibility in a Changing World: A Review of Empirical Research (2017-2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69718/ijesm.v3i2.450Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, Systematic Literature Review, Financial Perf, Stakeholder EngegementAbstract
This systematic literature review aims to synthesize empirical research on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) published between 2017 and 2019, addressing gaps in understanding how CSR is conceptualized, measured, and implemented amid evolving global expectations and digitalization. Using a systematic review methodology, we analyzed peer-reviewed empirical studies sourced from major academic databases, focusing on variables such as CSR’s impact on financial performance, stakeholder perceptions, and internal organizational factors. The review process involved rigorous screening and extraction of studies meeting strict inclusion criteria. Results indicate a consistently positive relationship between CSR and financial performance, with stakeholder engagement and organizational culture as key mediators. These findings refine CSR theory and offer actionable insights for both scholars and practitioners.
References
Ahmad, N., Scholz, M., Arshad, M. Z., & Ullah, Z. (2022). Corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender.1 Pacific Accounting Review, 34(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-09-2021-0162
Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., Arshad, M. Z., Kamran, H. W., Scholz, M., & Han, H. (2022).2 Relationship between corporate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender. Management Decision, 60(11), 2776–2794. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-11-2021-1515
Kabir, R., & Thai, H. M. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility improve financial performance? Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3053-6
Khan, H., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2019). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Journal of Development Studies, 55(12), 2537–2555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2019.1694144
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2018). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. Sustainability, 10(9), 3141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093141
Lăzăroiu, G., & Andronie, M. (2019). The role of corporate social responsibility in organizational sustainability. Knowledge-Based Organization, 25(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/kbo-2019-0045
Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2021). Understanding employee motivation and organizational performance: Arguments for a set-theoretic approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642688. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8060600/
Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Evidence from China. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.10052. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10052
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Organizations. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226409791_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_An_Empirical_Investigation_of_US_Organizations
Miras-Rodríguez, M. del M., Carrasco-Gallego, A., & Escobar-Pérez, B. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and performance: Evidence from listed companies in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1447
Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2020). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from the UK. Sustainability, 12(4), 1678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041678
Nair, S. R., & Menon, C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Evidence from India. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704422. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8394849/
Park, B. I., & Lee, S. (2018). Corporate social responsibility, firm performance, and the moderating role of ownership type. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3568-5
Salehi, M., Taghizadeh, M., & Bontis, N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from Iran. Journal of Business Research, 95, 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.039
Suryana, I. P., & Sedana, I. B. P. (2021). Corporate governance moderate the effect of CSR on financial performance.3 International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(5), 506–515.4 https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n5.19371
Wang, X., & Wang, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 763506. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8631389/
Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from China. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12582. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.12582
Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Performance: Evidence from China. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.00191. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.00191
Zhang, J., & Luo, X. (2021). Dynamic Capability and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption: Evidence from China. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351495557_Dynamic_Capability_and_Strategic_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_Adoption_Evidence_from_China
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 IJESM Indonesian Journal of Economics and Strategic Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
